Register for E-mail alerts. Comment on articles. Sign up today, it's easy.
Close
The Washington Times Online Edition

Virginia House vote states life starts at conception

Delegates set up high-stakes battle with Senate

RICHMOND — The Virginia House of Delegates approved legislation Tuesday that would define life as beginning at conception, setting up a potential clash in the state Senate and another high-stakes battle over a measure that has been beaten back elsewhere in the country in recent years.

Lawmakers tackled several contentious social issues on Tuesday, in addition to passing perhaps the most high-profile bill thus far this session. Delegate Robert G. Marshall’s “personhood” measure easily cleared the House on a 66-32 vote.

Mr. Marshall, Prince William Republican, said opponents have long searched for a “bogeyman in the closet on this legislation.”

“They have failed,” he said.

Opponents say that the bill moves a step closer to outlawing abortion outright, should the landmark Roe v. Wade Supreme Court decision be overturned and that it would make some forms of birth control illegal.

Delegate Vivian E. Watts, Fairfax Democrat, proposed an amendment Monday to ensure that contraception would remain legal, but it was rejected.

Tarina Keene, executive director of NARAL Pro-Choice Virginia, said the bill has potentially far-reaching consequences.

“With the word ‘person’ appearing more than 25,000 times in the Virginia code, single-minded legislators are about to run this commonwealth off a cliff as well as eradicating women’s health and rights,” she said.

The bill now heads to the Senate, where it likely will be sent to the Education and Health Committee. That committee last year killed the same bill, when Democrats enjoyed a 10-5 advantage. Republicans now hold an 8-7 edge there, and all eyes will be on Sen. Harry B. Blevins, Virginia Beach Republican, who sometimes bucks his party on abortion issues.

Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican and a Catholic, said Tuesday that he believes life begins at conception but that he had not looked at the bill in detail.

“Anytime you get into these areas, there are legal and constitutional issues,” he told WNIS Radio in Norfolk. “If the bill passes, we’ll have a full review done by the attorney general’s office to see whether or not it’s appropriate. But … obviously my personal views versus what the proper legal and constitutional views are is something we need to sort out to make sure we’re enacting good law.”

Mississippi voters rejected a “personhood” ballot initiative last fall, and Colorado voters did the same in 2008 and 2010.

The debate over the measure erupted soon after the White House backed off a mandate that employers, including religious institutions, cover birth control and other reproductive items in their health care plans amid outcry from religious leaders across the country.

Reproductive rights have been a particularly hot-button issue in Virginia this year, after Republicans won an effective majority of the state Senate in November to control the governor’s mansion and both chambers of the General Assembly.

The House of Delegates on Tuesday also approved a mandate that women undergo invasive ultrasound imaging before having an abortion, advancing another major item on the Republicans’ pro-life agenda. The Senate has passed its own version of the bill after quashing it last year.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2012 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
About the Author

David Sherfinski

David Sherfinski covers Virginia for The Washington Times’ Metro desk. Prior to that, he worked at the Washington Examiner covering a variety of topics, including local government, real estate and state politics. He is a graduate of Yale University. David can be reached at dsherfinski@washingtontimes.com.

You Might Also Like
  • D.C. Mayor Vincent C. Gray. (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)

    Campaign aide for Gray cuts plea deal

  • Battalion Fire Chief Kevin B. Sloan said he received no written explanation for his transfer to a desk job where he is in charge of overseeing use of supplies in fire stations. "It's not ethical, it's not moral. It's retaliatory action," he said. (Rod Lamkey Jr./The Washington Times)

    Battalion chief slams Ellerbe’s ‘bullying’

  • Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley is expected to sign a bill Tuesday that will raise the state's tax on non-cigarette tobacco products. (Barbara L. Salisbury/The Washington Times)

    Not content with new tax hike, Md. tobacco foe wants more

  • ** FILE ** A Metropolitan Police cruiser in downtown Washington (The Washington Times)

    5 shot, 5 stabbed in weekend of violence in D.C.

  • Firefighter harassment case strikes settlement

  • Happening Now

        Independent voices from the TWT Communities

        World View

        Columns from Voices around the World talking about the events, people, politics and social issues that concern us wherever, and whoever, we are.