The Washington Times

Topic - U.S. District Court For The Northern District Of California

Subscribe to this topic via RSS or ATOM
Related Stories
  • Samsung Electronics' Galaxy S III, right, and Apple's iPhone 4S are displayed at a mobile phone shop in Seoul, South Korea, Friday, Aug. 24, 2012. After a year of scorched-earth litigation, a jury decided Friday that Samsung ripped off the innovative technology used by Apple to create its revolutionary iPhone and iPad. The jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple $1.05 billion. An appeal is expected. (AP Photo/Ahn Young-joon)

    EDITORIAL: Samsung v. Apple

    A jury on Saturday decided electronics giant Samsung must cut a $1 billion check to Apple over an ongoing patent dispute. The jurors agreed Samsung's Galaxy line of phones are knock-offs of Apple's popular iPhone. Should this massive judgment stand, consumers will end up paying more and innovation will suffer.

  • Economy Briefs: Yahoo accuses Facebook of patent infringement

    Yahoo filed a lawsuit against Facebook on Monday accusing the social networking giant of patent infringement.

  • Dolby sues Blackberry maker RIM over patents

    Dolby International, a unit of audio equipment maker Dolby Laboratories Inc., is suing Research In Motion Ltd. for patent infringement in the U.S. and Germany.

  • Apple files suit against Samsung

    Apple Inc. has sued Samsung Electronics Co., saying the South Korean company's Galaxy line of smartphones and tablet computers copy Apple's popular iPad and iPhone.

  • Hundreds of same-sex marriage supporters march through San Francisco celebrating a federal judge's decision overturning California's same-sex marriage ban on Wednesday, Aug. 4, 2010. Chief U.S. District Judge Vaughn Walker made his ruling in a lawsuit filed by two gay couples who claimed the voter-approved ban violated their civil rights. (AP Photo/Noah Berger)

    EDITORIAL: The arrogance of judicial power

    A homosexual judge branded 7,001,084 California voters as hateful people on Wednesday. In so doing, Vaughn R. Walker, a man never elected to his lifetime position, decided he would reshape the state to better suit his personal lifestyle preference. In striking down Proposition 8's simple statement that, "Only marriage between a man and a woman is valid or recognized in California," Judge Vaughn undermined not just the political process, but society itself.

  • Attorneys (from left) Theodore Olson and David Boies speak with plaintiffs Sandy Stier and Kris Perry on Tuesday, June 15, 2010, in San Francisco before Wednesday's closing arguments in the landmark federal trial over the constitutionality of California's gay-marriage ban, which is expected eventually to reach the U.S. Supreme Court. (AP Photo/Ben Margot)

    Lawyer: Gays denied right by Calif. marriage ban

    The landmark federal trial over the constitutionality of California's gay marriage ban resumed Wednesday with a lawyer arguing that supporters of the ban were trying to deprive same-sex couples of a relationship the U.S. Supreme Court has recognized as a fundamental right.

More Stories →

Happening Now